Comparison
Graupen vs Kasza Pęczak
Overall, Kasza Pęczak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Graupen | Kasza Pęczak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 94 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Graupen has 73% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 343 kcal).
- Graupen has 80% less fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Graupen has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Kasza Pęczak has 76% more fiber (5.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kasza Pęczak has 71% more protein (9 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kasza Pęczak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Graupen lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Graupen
Gerste
Kasza Pęczak
Kasza pęczak jęczmienny
FAQ
Which is healthier: Graupen or Kasza Pęczak?
Overall, Kasza Pęczak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Graupen has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kasza Pęczak has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.