Comparison

Fruit and grain bites blueberry vs Apple and cinnamon fruit and grain bars

Overall, Fruit and grain bites blueberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFruit and grain bites bluebe...Apple and cinnamon fruit and...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 347 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.9 g
Sugars 16 g 33 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.4 g
Fiber 29.3 g —
Protein 5.3 g 4.4 g
Additives60
AllergensApple, Gluten, LupinNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apple and cinnamon fruit and grain bars has 32% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Fruit and grain bites blueberry has 52% less sugar (16 g vs 33 g).
  • Fruit and grain bites blueberry has 17% more protein (5.3 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Fruit and grain bites blueberry has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Fruit and grain bites blueberry lists: Apple, Gluten, Lupin.

Ingredients

Fruit and grain bites blueberry

Blueberry filling (prebiotic fibers (FOS), blueberries, apples, pectin, lemon juice concentrate, black carrot juice), whole grain flour (spelt, lupine, barley, oat), vegetable fats (sustainable palm oil, coconut oil), cane sugar, vinegar, natural flavorings, flaxseed flour, sunflower lecithin, xanthan gum, baking soda, sea salt.

Apple and cinnamon fruit and grain bars

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fruit and grain bites blueberry or Apple and cinnamon fruit and grain bars?

Overall, Fruit and grain bites blueberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fruit and grain bites blueberry has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fruit and grain bites blueberry has less sugar: 16 g versus 33 g per 100 g.

More comparisons