Frit ravich active vs Cashew
Overall, Cashew has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frit ravich active | Cashew |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 560 kcal | 622 kcal |
| Fat | 40 g | 49.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 10.6 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 8.4 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 21.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frit ravich active has 19% less fat (40 g vs 49.2 g).
- Frit ravich active has 66% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 10.6 g).
- Cashew has 68% less sugar (8 g vs 25 g).
- Cashew has 20% more fiber (8.4 g vs 6.7 g).
- Cashew has 34% more protein (21.3 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Frit ravich active
Blanched and toasted hazelnus (35%), blanched and toasted almonds (35%), candied papaya (30%) [papaya, sugar, preservative (sodium metabisulphite)]. May contain peanuts and other nuts with shells.
Cashew
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frit ravich active or Cashew?
Overall, Cashew has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frit ravich active has fewer calories: 560 kcal versus 622 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew has less sugar: 8 g versus 25 g per 100 g.