Comparison

Foutou D'igname vs Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi)

Overall, Foutou D'igname has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFoutou D'ignameGetrocknete und Geräucherte...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 294 kcal 343 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 2.7 g
Fiber 14.4 g 0 g
Protein 4.7 g 81.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Foutou D'igname has 14% fewer calories (294 kcal vs 343 kcal).
  • Foutou D'igname has 56% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) has no sugar, while Foutou D'igname has 0.7 g.
  • Foutou D'igname has no salt, while Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) has 2.7 g.
  • Foutou D'igname has 100% more fiber (14.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) has 94% more protein (81.8 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Foutou D'igname has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Foutou D'igname

Igname, Fécule (pomme de terre, maïs)

Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi)

Fisch

FAQ

Which is healthier: Foutou D'igname or Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi)?

Overall, Foutou D'igname has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Foutou D'igname has fewer calories: 294 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Getrocknete und Geräucherte Bonitoflocken (Katsuobushi) has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons