Comparison

Flour vs Baking Powder

Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlourBaking Powder
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 341 kcal 161 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0.3 g
Salt 0 g 35.7 g
Fiber — 2.9 g
Protein 9.4 g 3.5 g
Additives14
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baking Powder has 53% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Baking Powder has 46% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Baking Powder has 80% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Flour has no salt, while Baking Powder has 35.7 g.
  • Flour has 63% more protein (9.4 g vs 3.5 g).

Ingredients

Flour

100% British Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin) (100%). ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold. This flour is produced on a site that also produces products containing soya.

Baking Powder

Raising agents, disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen carbonate, wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flour or Baking Powder?

Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baking Powder has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baking Powder has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons