Bicarbonate Of soda vs Baking Powder
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bicarbonate Of soda | Baking Powder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 161 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 66.3 g | 35.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no calories, while Baking Powder has 161 kcal.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no fat, while Baking Powder has 0.7 g.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no sugar, while Baking Powder has 0.3 g.
- Baking Powder has 46% less salt (35.7 g vs 66.3 g).
- Baking Powder has 100% more fiber (2.9 g vs 0 g).
- Baking Powder has 100% more protein (3.5 g vs 0 g).
- Bicarbonate Of soda is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Baking Powder lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bicarbonate Of soda
Raising agent (E500 (sodium carbonates)).
Baking Powder
Raising agents, disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen carbonate, wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bicarbonate Of soda or Baking Powder?
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bicarbonate Of soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bicarbonate Of soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.