Bicarbonate Of soda vs Stevia sweet Poudre
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bicarbonate Of soda | Stevia sweet Poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 14.3 g |
| Salt | 66.3 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 57.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no calories, while Stevia sweet Poudre has 114 kcal.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no sugar, while Stevia sweet Poudre has 14.3 g.
- Stevia sweet Poudre has 100% more fiber (57.1 g vs 0 g).
- Bicarbonate Of soda is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bicarbonate Of soda
Raising agent (E500 (sodium carbonates)).
Stevia sweet Poudre
Maltodextrin 55%, Fuctofibers(Inulin 34%, Oligofuctrose 8%), Steviol Glycosides, Thaumatin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bicarbonate Of soda or Stevia sweet Poudre?
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bicarbonate Of soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bicarbonate Of soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 14.3 g per 100 g.