Comparison
Bicarbonate Of soda vs Cocoa
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bicarbonate Of soda | Cocoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 406 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 14.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 66.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 29.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 22.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no calories, while Cocoa has 406 kcal.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no fat, while Cocoa has 23 g.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no saturated fat, while Cocoa has 14.5 g.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no sugar, while Cocoa has 5 g.
- Cocoa has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 66.3 g).
- Cocoa has 100% more fiber (29.5 g vs 0 g).
- Cocoa has 100% more protein (22.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Cocoa lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bicarbonate Of soda
Raising agent (E500 (sodium carbonates)).
Cocoa
cocoa, may contain _milk_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bicarbonate Of soda or Cocoa?
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bicarbonate Of soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bicarbonate Of soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 5 g per 100 g.