Baking Powder vs Fine Desiccated Coconut
Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking Powder | Fine Desiccated Coconut |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 632 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 35.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 13.2 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baking Powder has 75% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 632 kcal).
- Baking Powder has 99% less fat (0.7 g vs 62 g).
- Baking Powder has 99% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 16 g).
- Baking Powder has 80% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
- Fine Desiccated Coconut has 100% less salt (0 g vs 35.7 g).
- Fine Desiccated Coconut has 78% more fiber (13.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Fine Desiccated Coconut has 37% more protein (5.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Only Baking Powder lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Baking Powder
Raising agents, disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen carbonate, wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin.
Fine Desiccated Coconut
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking Powder or Fine Desiccated Coconut?
Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking Powder has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 632 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking Powder has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.