Bicarbonate Of soda vs Flour
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bicarbonate Of soda | Flour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 66.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no calories, while Flour has 341 kcal.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no fat, while Flour has 1.3 g.
- Bicarbonate Of soda has no sugar, while Flour has 1.5 g.
- Flour has no salt, while Bicarbonate Of soda has 66.3 g.
- Flour has 100% more protein (9.4 g vs 0 g).
- Bicarbonate Of soda is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bicarbonate Of soda
Raising agent (E500 (sodium carbonates)).
Flour
100% British Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin) (100%). ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold. This flour is produced on a site that also produces products containing soya.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bicarbonate Of soda or Flour?
Overall, Bicarbonate Of soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bicarbonate Of soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bicarbonate Of soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.