Flönz vs Lacón en tapas
Overall, Lacón en tapas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flönz | Lacón en tapas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 19.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lacón en tapas has 70% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Lacón en tapas has 91% less fat (3.1 g vs 35 g).
- Lacón en tapas has 90% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 12.5 g).
- Lacón en tapas has 33% more protein (19.5 g vs 13 g).
- Lacón en tapas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Flönz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Flönz
72% Schweinefleisch, 13% Speck, Schweineblut, 3% Schweineschwarten, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Naturdarm Rind, Rauch.
Lacón en tapas
Jamón de cerdo (93%), agua, sal, azúcares, fermento, extracto de especias, estabilizante (tri-di-. polifosfatos). antioxidante(ascorbato sódico), aroma de humo, conservador (nitrito sódico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flönz or Lacón en tapas?
Overall, Lacón en tapas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lacón en tapas has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flönz has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.