Comparison

Nürnberger Bratwürste vs Lacón en tapas

Overall, Lacón en tapas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNürnberger BratwürsteLacón en tapas
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 350 kcal 110 kcal
Fat 32 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 12 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 2 g
Fiber 1 g 0 g
Protein 14 g 19.5 g
Additives13
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lacón en tapas has 69% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • Lacón en tapas has 90% less fat (3.1 g vs 32 g).
  • Lacón en tapas has 90% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 12 g).
  • Lacón en tapas has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Nürnberger Bratwürste has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Lacón en tapas has 28% more protein (19.5 g vs 14 g).
  • Lacón en tapas has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Nürnberger Bratwürste

95% Schweinefleisch, Speck, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Dextrose, Säuerungsmittel (Natriumcitrate), Schafsaitling. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.

Lacón en tapas

Jamón de cerdo (93%), agua, sal, azúcares, fermento, extracto de especias, estabilizante (tri-di-. polifosfatos). antioxidante(ascorbato sódico), aroma de humo, conservador (nitrito sódico).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Nürnberger Bratwürste or Lacón en tapas?

Overall, Lacón en tapas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lacón en tapas has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lacón en tapas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons