Comparison

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut vs Salted Caramel Oaty Square

Overall, Salted Caramel Oaty Square has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlapjack Oat Bar CoconutSalted Caramel Oaty Square
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 446 kcal 363 kcal
Fat 22 g 13 g
Saturated fat 9 g 2 g
Sugars 26 g 14 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 4.8 g 13 g
Protein 6.5 g 6.3 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has 19% fewer calories (363 kcal vs 446 kcal).
  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has 41% less fat (13 g vs 22 g).
  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has 78% less saturated fat (2 g vs 9 g).
  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has 46% less sugar (14 g vs 26 g).
  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has 63% more fiber (13 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Salted Caramel Oaty Square has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Salted Caramel Oaty Square lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut

Not available.

Salted Caramel Oaty Square

Wholegrain Scottish OATS (49%), chicory root fibre low sugar caramel (11%) (oligofructose, humectant: glycerine, vegetable fat, gelling agent: pectin, emulsifiers: man and diglycerides of fatty acids and rapeseed lecithin, salt and natural flavouring), golden syrup, rapeseed oil, sultanas, vegetable glycerine and natural chocolate flavour.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flapjack Oat Bar Coconut or Salted Caramel Oaty Square?

Overall, Salted Caramel Oaty Square has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salted Caramel Oaty Square has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salted Caramel Oaty Square has less sugar: 14 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons