Comparison

Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche vs Filet de maquereaux à l’escabèche

Overall, Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maqueraux sauce es...Filet de maquereaux à l’esca...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 200 kcal 226 kcal
Fat 15 g 18.5 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 3.4 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1.7 g
Salt 1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 13 g 13.1 g
Additives21
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has 12% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 226 kcal).
  • Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has 19% less fat (15 g vs 18.5 g).
  • Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has 26% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche

filets de MAQUEREAUX 56%, eau, vinaigre d'alcool, huile de colza, oignons 2,3%, double concentré de tomates 1,8%, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, gomme xanthane, persil, arôme naturel d'ail, piment fort.

Filet de maquereaux à l’escabèche

Maquereaux scombrus 57% (pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est), eau, huile de colza, vinaigre, oignons, épices et plantes aromatiques, concentré de tomates, sel, épaississants : farine de graines de guar et de caroube, arômes naturels.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche or Filet de maquereaux à l’escabèche?

Overall, Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 226 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maqueraux sauce escabeche has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons