Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés vs Filets de colin d'alaska
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés
Filets de colin d'alaska
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC... | Filets de colin d'alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 8.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés
Filet de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (_poisson_), chapelure 18%(farine de _blé_, levure, sel), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, eau, sel, _gluten_ de _blé_. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œuf, mollusques, céleri, soja.
Filets de colin d'alaska
Filets de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 65%, chapelure (farine de _blé_, levure, sel) ; huiles végétales (tournesol, colza) ; farine de _blé_ ; eau ; sel ; _gluten de blé_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés or Filets de colin d'alaska?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de colin d'alaska has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.