Comparison

Colin à la bordelaise vs Filets de colin d'alaska

Overall, Filets de colin d'alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin à la bordelaiseFilets de colin d'alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 157 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.8 g 1 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 13 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin à la bordelaise has 23% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 204 kcal).
  • Filets de colin d'alaska has 58% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Filets de colin d'alaska has 42% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Filets de colin d'alaska has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Colin à la bordelaise is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Colin à la bordelaise lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Colin à la bordelaise

_Colin_ d'Alaska 71%, chapelure 8,3% (dont _blé_), huile de colza, eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 2,9%, _beurre_ 2,5%, oignons 2,5%, persil 0,79%, sel, sucre, ail en poudre, paprika

Filets de colin d'alaska

Filets de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 65%, chapelure (farine de _blé_, levure, sel) ; huiles végétales (tournesol, colza) ; farine de _blé_ ; eau ; sel ; _gluten de blé_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin à la bordelaise or Filets de colin d'alaska?

Overall, Filets de colin d'alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin à la bordelaise has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons