Colin à la bordelaise vs Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Overall, Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Colin à la bordelaise
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin à la bordelaise | Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfil... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 157 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 30% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 157 kcal).
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 40% less fat (5.3 g vs 8.8 g).
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 63% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Colin à la bordelaise has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Only Colin à la bordelaise lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Colin à la bordelaise
_Colin_ d'Alaska 71%, chapelure 8,3% (dont _blé_), huile de colza, eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 2,9%, _beurre_ 2,5%, oignons 2,5%, persil 0,79%, sel, sucre, ail en poudre, paprika
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
75% Alaska-Seelachsfilet, Wasser, Rapsöl, Weizenmehl, weiße Zwiebeln, 1,4% Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Zwiebelpulver, Knoblauchpulver, Paprika, Kurkuma), Stärke, 0,4% Petersilie, Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin à la bordelaise or Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.