Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés vs Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Overall, Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC... | Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfil... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 46% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has 37% less fat (5.3 g vs 8.4 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés has 47% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.9 g).
- Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés
Filet de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (_poisson_), chapelure 18%(farine de _blé_, levure, sel), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, eau, sel, _gluten_ de _blé_. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œuf, mollusques, céleri, soja.
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic
75% Alaska-Seelachsfilet, Wasser, Rapsöl, Weizenmehl, weiße Zwiebeln, 1,4% Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Zwiebelpulver, Knoblauchpulver, Paprika, Kurkuma), Stärke, 0,4% Petersilie, Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (*) Panés or Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alaska-Seelachs Schlemmerfilet á la Bordelaise classic has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.