Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC vs Colin à la bordelaise
Overall, Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC | Colin à la bordelaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 8.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 54% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 157 kcal).
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 93% less fat (0.6 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 89% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Colin à la bordelaise lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Filets de Colin d'Alaska
Colin à la bordelaise
_Colin_ d'Alaska 71%, chapelure 8,3% (dont _blé_), huile de colza, eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 2,9%, _beurre_ 2,5%, oignons 2,5%, persil 0,79%, sel, sucre, ail en poudre, paprika
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC or Colin à la bordelaise?
Overall, Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.