Comparison

Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC vs Filets de colin d'alaska

Overall, Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de Colin d'Alaska MSCFilets de colin d'alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 73 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 17 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 64% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 204 kcal).
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 93% less fat (0.6 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 75% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Filets de colin d'alaska has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 29% more protein (17 g vs 12 g).
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Filets de colin d'alaska lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Filets de Colin d'Alaska

Filets de colin d'alaska

Filets de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 65%, chapelure (farine de _blé_, levure, sel) ; huiles végétales (tournesol, colza) ; farine de _blé_ ; eau ; sel ; _gluten de blé_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC or Filets de colin d'alaska?

Overall, Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons