4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard vs Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 Tranches de filet de Colin... | Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 17.2 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard has no sugar, while Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 0.5 g.
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard
Colin d'Alaska (_poisson_) qualité sans arête*, Theragra chalcogramma sauvage pêché au chalut dans l'Océan Pacifique Nord (FAO 61, 67) *présence exceptionnelle d'arête jamais exclue
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Filets de Colin d'Alaska
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard or Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.