Comparison

Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlaska-SeelachsfiletFilets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 71 kcal 73 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 16 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no sugar, while Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 0.5 g.
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 0.6 g.
  • Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Alaska-Seelachsfilet

Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).

Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Filets de Colin d'Alaska

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC?

Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons