Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alaska-Seelachsfilet | Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no sugar, while Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 0.5 g.
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 0.6 g.
- Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).
Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC
Filets de Colin d'Alaska
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or Filets de Colin d'Alaska MSC?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.