Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alaska-Seelachsfilet | Filets de colin d'Alaska meu... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 12.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 55% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 157 kcal).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 87% less fat (0.8 g vs 6.3 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no sugar, while Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière has 0.7 g.
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière has 0.7 g.
- Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 20% more protein (16 g vs 12.8 g).
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).
Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière
75% Filet de Colin d'Alaska MSC (poissons) (Theragra chalcogramma), eau, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza), 9% farine de blé, amidon de blé, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, gluten de blé, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de blé, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, 0.08% persil déshydraté. Traces éventuelles de mollusques, œufs, soja, céleri, lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or Filets de colin d'Alaska meunière?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.