Filet Saumon sauce citron vs Lomo de salmón
Overall, Filet Saumon sauce citron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet Saumon sauce citron | Lomo de salmón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 156 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet Saumon sauce citron has 30% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- Filet Saumon sauce citron has 62% less fat (6.1 g vs 16 g).
- Filet Saumon sauce citron has 52% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Lomo de salmón has no sugar, while Filet Saumon sauce citron has 0.9 g.
- Lomo de salmón has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Filet Saumon sauce citron has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
- Lomo de salmón is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filet Saumon sauce citron
Saumon 60%, eau, huile de tournesol, jus de citron 3,9%, vinaigre d'alcool, zestes de citron 1,6%, sel, huile d'olive vierge extra, sucre, arôme naturel de citron avec autres arômes naturels, amidon modifié de maïs, épaississant : gomme xanthane, gélifiant : carraghénanes, plantes aromatiques (aneth, ciboulette, persil), poivron rouge déshydraté.
Lomo de salmón
Salmón sin piel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet Saumon sauce citron or Lomo de salmón?
Overall, Filet Saumon sauce citron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet Saumon sauce citron has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo de salmón has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.