Comparison

Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto vs Haddock fillets

Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet d'églefin et son quino...Haddock fillets
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 145 kcal 109 kcal
Fat 6.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 7.8 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haddock fillets has 25% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 145 kcal).
  • Haddock fillets has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 67% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 69% more protein (25 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Haddock fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Haddock fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto

Not available.

Haddock fillets

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto or Haddock fillets?

Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haddock fillets has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haddock fillets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons