Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto vs Filet d'églefin msc
Overall, Filet d'églefin msc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet d'églefin et son quino... | Filet d'églefin msc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 17.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet d'églefin msc has 48% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Filet d'églefin msc has no fat, while Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto has 6.8 g.
- Filet d'églefin msc has no saturated fat, while Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto has 3.9 g.
- Filet d'églefin msc has no sugar, while Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto has 2 g.
- Filet d'églefin msc has 74% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filet d'églefin msc has 55% more protein (17.3 g vs 7.8 g).
- Filet d'églefin msc has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filet d'églefin msc lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto
Not available.
Filet d'églefin msc
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet d'églefin et son quinoa façon risotto or Filet d'églefin msc?
Overall, Filet d'églefin msc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet d'églefin msc has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet d'églefin msc has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.