Comparison
Fat Free Quark vs Leivonta-rahka
Overall, Fat Free Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fat Free Quark | Leivonta-rahka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fat Free Quark has 55% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 133 kcal).
- Fat Free Quark has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Fat Free Quark has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.8 g).
- Fat Free Quark has 25% more protein (12 g vs 9 g).
- Fat Free Quark has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Leivonta-rahka lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fat Free Quark
Not available.
Leivonta-rahka
maitorahka (pastöroitu maito ja hapate), pastöroitu kerma. Maidon alkuperämaa Suomi.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fat Free Quark or Leivonta-rahka?
Overall, Fat Free Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fat Free Quark has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leivonta-rahka has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.