Energy'mix vs Kiełki jarmużu
Overall, Energy'mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Energy'mix | Kiełki jarmużu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Energy'mix has 36% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Energy'mix has 46% less fat (2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Energy'mix has 38% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Energy'mix has 26% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kiełki jarmużu has 29% more protein (5.5 g vs 3.9 g).
Ingredients
Energy'mix
Graines germées de betterave rouge (40%), brocolis (30%), alfalfa (27%), roquette (3%). *Ingrédients issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Kiełki jarmużu
kiełki jarmużu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Energy'mix or Kiełki jarmużu?
Overall, Energy'mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Energy'mix has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Energy'mix has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.