Energy'mix vs Kiełki koniczyny
Overall, Kiełki koniczyny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Energy'mix | Kiełki koniczyny |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kiełki koniczyny has 47% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Kiełki koniczyny has 85% less fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Kiełki koniczyny has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Energy'mix has 76% more fiber (3.4 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Energy'mix
Graines germées de betterave rouge (40%), brocolis (30%), alfalfa (27%), roquette (3%). *Ingrédients issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Kiełki koniczyny
kiełki koniczyny
FAQ
Which is healthier: Energy'mix or Kiełki koniczyny?
Overall, Kiełki koniczyny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kiełki koniczyny has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kiełki koniczyny has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.