Comparison
Kiełki jarmużu vs Kiełki koniczyny
Overall, Kiełki koniczyny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kiełki jarmużu | Kiełki koniczyny |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 70 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kiełki koniczyny has 66% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Kiełki koniczyny has 92% less fat (0.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Kiełki koniczyny has 85% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kiełki jarmużu has 68% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kiełki jarmużu has 22% more protein (5.5 g vs 4.3 g).
Ingredients
Kiełki jarmużu
kiełki jarmużu
Kiełki koniczyny
kiełki koniczyny
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kiełki jarmużu or Kiełki koniczyny?
Overall, Kiełki koniczyny has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kiełki koniczyny has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kiełki koniczyny has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.