Encornet geants cuits vs Calamar
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Encornet geants cuits | Calamar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Calamar has 48% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Calamar has 73% less fat (1.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Calamar has no sugar, while Encornet geants cuits has 0.7 g.
- Calamar has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Encornet geants cuits has 25% more protein (16 g vs 12 g).
- Only Encornet geants cuits lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Encornet geants cuits
90% encornets géants cuits (encornets géants (Dosidicus gigas (mollusques)), acidifiants : acide citrique, citrates de sodium), huile végétale de colza, graisse végétale de karité, 0,8% ail déshydraté, sel, huile d'olive, persil déshydraté, poivron rouge déshydraté, arômes naturels, cerfeuil déshydraté, épices, ciboulette déshydratée. Traces possibles de céleri, de poisson, de crustacé.
Calamar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Encornet geants cuits or Calamar?
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Calamar has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Calamar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.