Comparison
Tintenfisch vs Calamar
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tintenfisch | Calamar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Calamar has 83% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Calamar has 95% less fat (1.5 g vs 31 g).
- Calamar has 76% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- Tintenfisch has 25% more protein (16 g vs 12 g).
- Calamar has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tintenfisch
Not available.
Calamar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tintenfisch or Calamar?
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Calamar has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tintenfisch has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.