Comparison
Egg Replacer vs Oggs Aquafaba
Overall, Oggs Aquafaba has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Egg Replacer | Oggs Aquafaba |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 8 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oggs Aquafaba has 95% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Egg Replacer has no sugar, while Oggs Aquafaba has 1.1 g.
- Oggs Aquafaba has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 8 g).
- Oggs Aquafaba has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Oggs Aquafaba has the better Nutri-Score.
- Oggs Aquafaba is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Egg Replacer
Potato Starch, Tapioca Flour, Baking Soda, Psyllium Husk.
Oggs Aquafaba
Liquid Chickpea Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Egg Replacer or Oggs Aquafaba?
Overall, Oggs Aquafaba has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oggs Aquafaba has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Egg Replacer has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.