Eco pufuleti vs Original 5 céréales
Overall, Original 5 céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eco pufuleti | Original 5 céréales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 476 kcal | 412 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Avoine |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Original 5 céréales has 13% fewer calories (412 kcal vs 476 kcal).
- Original 5 céréales has 40% less fat (12 g vs 20 g).
- Original 5 céréales has 82% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 8.3 g).
- Eco pufuleti has 28% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Original 5 céréales has 84% more fiber (12 g vs 1.9 g).
- Original 5 céréales has 45% more protein (11 g vs 6.1 g).
- Original 5 céréales has the better Nutri-Score.
- Eco pufuleti is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Original 5 céréales lists: Gluten, Milk, Avoine.
Ingredients
Eco pufuleti
78,5% mălai grișat*, ulei vegetal de palmier*, sare, *din agricultură ecologică controlată,
Original 5 céréales
Fünfkornmehl 91% (WEIZEN, HAFER, ROGGEN, GERSTE, DINKEL), Sonnenblumenöl, MagerMILCHpulver, Kochsalz, Hefe, GERSTENmalzextrakt, Backtriebmittel: E 500, E 503, natürliches Aroma, Vitamin: Folsäure. Kann Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eco pufuleti or Original 5 céréales?
Overall, Original 5 céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original 5 céréales has fewer calories: 412 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eco pufuleti has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.