Croques cabillaud vs 2 croques saumons pomme de terre et légumes
Overall, Croques cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Croques cabillaud
2 croques saumons pomme de terre et légumes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Croques cabillaud | 2 croques saumons pomme de t... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 9.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croques cabillaud has 35% less fat (6.1 g vs 9.4 g).
- Croques cabillaud has 25% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Croques cabillaud
Pommes de terre 41%, cabillaud* 34% (Gadus spp.), farines de blé et de pommes de terre, huile de tournesol, œufs entiers, crème fraîche, échalote 1,9%, persil 1,4%, ail 1%, sel, citron 0,1%, poivre, curcuma.
2 croques saumons pomme de terre et légumes
27% Saumon Atlantique ASC (poissons) (Salmo salar), 21% pomme de terre, 12% carottes, 10% colin d'Alaska MSC, 10% courgettes, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza), œufs, 4% oignons, crème, farine de blé, flocons de pomme de terre, sel, plante aromatique, zeste de citron, jus concentré de citron, ail déshydraté, épices.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Croques cabillaud or 2 croques saumons pomme de terre et légumes?
Overall, Croques cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croques cabillaud has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croques cabillaud has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.