Crème en poudre Panna Cotta vs Panna cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
Panna cotta
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème en poudre Panna Cotta | Panna cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 245 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 14.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 36% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- Panna cotta has 47% less fat (9 g vs 17 g).
- Panna cotta has 37% less saturated fat (6 g vs 9.5 g).
- Panna cotta has 15% less sugar (14.4 g vs 17 g).
- Only Crème en poudre Panna Cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
58% poudre pour crème (sucre, sirop de glucose, gélatine, amidon, stabilisant (gomme xanthane), gélifiant (carraghénanes), arôme), 42% sauce aux fruits des bois (sucre, fruits des bois (myrtilles, mures, fraises, framboises), sirop de glucose-fructose, eau, amidon modifié, gélifiant (carraghénanes), acidifiant (E 330), arômes).
Panna cotta
Glucose syrup, caramelized sugars. Can contain traces of milk PREPARATION POUR "PANNA COTTA" avec plein de Caramel Ingrédients: sucre, amidon de mais, gélatine alimentaire, gélifiant: carraghénanes, arômes. Ingrédients du Caramel: sirop de glucose, sucres caramélisés. Peut contenir des traces de lait 90g e complessivi Prodotto da/Produced by/Fabriqué par: Molino F.lli Chiavazza SPA Via Racconigi, 5-12030 Casalgrasso (CN) nello stabilimento di Via Pinerolo, 75 10060 Pancalieri (TO) Italia Tel. 011 975606 - Fax 011 975078 PRODUCT OF ITALY Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il Best before: A consommer de préférence avant le:
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème en poudre Panna Cotta or Panna cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta has less sugar: 14.4 g versus 17 g per 100 g.