Panna cotta vs Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta | Crème en poudre Panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 9.5 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 32% fewer calories (167 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- Panna cotta has 46% less fat (9.2 g vs 17 g).
- Panna cotta has 29% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 9.5 g).
- Panna cotta has 12% less sugar (15 g vs 17 g).
- Panna cotta has 67% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Panna cotta has 25% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
Panna cotta
lait entier,crème 43 %,sucre,gélatine,amidon modifié,émulsifiant,E471,E339,carraghenane,arôme naturel,sans gluten
Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
58% poudre pour crème (sucre, sirop de glucose, gélatine, amidon, stabilisant (gomme xanthane), gélifiant (carraghénanes), arôme), 42% sauce aux fruits des bois (sucre, fruits des bois (myrtilles, mures, fraises, framboises), sirop de glucose-fructose, eau, amidon modifié, gélifiant (carraghénanes), acidifiant (E 330), arômes).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta or Crème en poudre Panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta has less sugar: 15 g versus 17 g per 100 g.