Panna Cota vs Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cota | Crème en poudre Panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 9.5 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cota has 29% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- Panna Cota has 29% less fat (12 g vs 17 g).
- Panna Cota has 28% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 9.5 g).
- Panna Cota has 29% less sugar (12 g vs 17 g).
- Panna Cota has 13% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Crème en poudre Panna Cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Panna Cota
Not available.
Crème en poudre Panna Cotta
58% poudre pour crème (sucre, sirop de glucose, gélatine, amidon, stabilisant (gomme xanthane), gélifiant (carraghénanes), arôme), 42% sauce aux fruits des bois (sucre, fruits des bois (myrtilles, mures, fraises, framboises), sirop de glucose-fructose, eau, amidon modifié, gélifiant (carraghénanes), acidifiant (E 330), arômes).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cota or Crème en poudre Panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cota has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 17 g per 100 g.