Panna Cota vs Preparado per panna Cotta
Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cota | Preparado per panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 236 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cota has 26% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 236 kcal).
- Panna Cota has 25% less fat (12 g vs 16 g).
- Panna Cota has 32% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 10 g).
- Panna Cota has 33% less sugar (12 g vs 18 g).
- Panna Cota has 39% more protein (3.8 g vs 2.3 g).
Ingredients
Panna Cota
Not available.
Preparado per panna Cotta
zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, gelificante: pectina; sale, estratto naturale di vaniglia. Ingredienti guarnizione ai frutti di bosco (37%): zucchero, frutti di bosco in proporzione variabile 35% (mirtilli neri, more, fragole, lamponi), sciroppo di glucosio - fruttosio, addensanti: amido modificato da mais, farina di semi di carrube; correttore di acidità: acido citrico; aromi naturali. Può contenere tracce di latte e suoi derivati, soia e suoi derivati.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cota or Preparado per panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cota has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 18 g per 100 g.