Comparison

Preparado per panna Cotta vs Panna cotta

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPreparado per panna CottaPanna cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 236 kcal 158 kcal
Fat 16 g 9 g
Saturated fat 10 g 6 g
Sugars 18 g 14.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 2.3 g 3.5 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna cotta has 33% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 236 kcal).
  • Panna cotta has 44% less fat (9 g vs 16 g).
  • Panna cotta has 40% less saturated fat (6 g vs 10 g).
  • Panna cotta has 20% less sugar (14.4 g vs 18 g).
  • Panna cotta has 34% more protein (3.5 g vs 2.3 g).

Ingredients

Preparado per panna Cotta

zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, gelificante: pectina; sale, estratto naturale di vaniglia. Ingredienti guarnizione ai frutti di bosco (37%): zucchero, frutti di bosco in proporzione variabile 35% (mirtilli neri, more, fragole, lamponi), sciroppo di glucosio - fruttosio, addensanti: amido modificato da mais, farina di semi di carrube; correttore di acidità: acido citrico; aromi naturali. Può contenere tracce di latte e suoi derivati, soia e suoi derivati.

Panna cotta

Glucose syrup, caramelized sugars. Can contain traces of milk PREPARATION POUR "PANNA COTTA" avec plein de Caramel Ingrédients: sucre, amidon de mais, gélatine alimentaire, gélifiant: carraghénanes, arômes. Ingrédients du Caramel: sirop de glucose, sucres caramélisés. Peut contenir des traces de lait 90g e complessivi Prodotto da/Produced by/Fabriqué par: Molino F.lli Chiavazza SPA Via Racconigi, 5-12030 Casalgrasso (CN) nello stabilimento di Via Pinerolo, 75 10060 Pancalieri (TO) Italia Tel. 011 975606 - Fax 011 975078 PRODUCT OF ITALY Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il Best before: A consommer de préférence avant le:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Preparado per panna Cotta or Panna cotta?

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna cotta has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna cotta has less sugar: 14.4 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons