Comparison

Preparato per panna cotta vs Panna cotta

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPreparato per panna cottaPanna cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 256 kcal 158 kcal
Fat 18 g 9 g
Saturated fat 12 g 6 g
Sugars 16 g 14.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 2.5 g 3.5 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna cotta has 38% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 256 kcal).
  • Panna cotta has 50% less fat (9 g vs 18 g).
  • Panna cotta has 50% less saturated fat (6 g vs 12 g).
  • Panna cotta has 29% more protein (3.5 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

Preparato per panna cotta

Zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, carragenina, sale, aroma naturale di vaniglia.

Panna cotta

Glucose syrup, caramelized sugars. Can contain traces of milk PREPARATION POUR "PANNA COTTA" avec plein de Caramel Ingrédients: sucre, amidon de mais, gélatine alimentaire, gélifiant: carraghénanes, arômes. Ingrédients du Caramel: sirop de glucose, sucres caramélisés. Peut contenir des traces de lait 90g e complessivi Prodotto da/Produced by/Fabriqué par: Molino F.lli Chiavazza SPA Via Racconigi, 5-12030 Casalgrasso (CN) nello stabilimento di Via Pinerolo, 75 10060 Pancalieri (TO) Italia Tel. 011 975606 - Fax 011 975078 PRODUCT OF ITALY Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il Best before: A consommer de préférence avant le:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Preparato per panna cotta or Panna cotta?

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna cotta has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna cotta has less sugar: 14.4 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons