Comparison

Prepare pour panna cotta vs Panna cotta

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPrepare pour panna cottaPanna cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 377 kcal 158 kcal
Fat 0 g 9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 6 g
Sugars 77 g 14.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.1 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna cotta has 58% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Prepare pour panna cotta has no fat, while Panna cotta has 9 g.
  • Prepare pour panna cotta has no saturated fat, while Panna cotta has 6 g.
  • Panna cotta has 81% less sugar (14.4 g vs 77 g).
  • Panna cotta has 97% more protein (3.5 g vs 0.1 g).

Ingredients

Prepare pour panna cotta

Not available.

Panna cotta

Glucose syrup, caramelized sugars. Can contain traces of milk PREPARATION POUR "PANNA COTTA" avec plein de Caramel Ingrédients: sucre, amidon de mais, gélatine alimentaire, gélifiant: carraghénanes, arômes. Ingrédients du Caramel: sirop de glucose, sucres caramélisés. Peut contenir des traces de lait 90g e complessivi Prodotto da/Produced by/Fabriqué par: Molino F.lli Chiavazza SPA Via Racconigi, 5-12030 Casalgrasso (CN) nello stabilimento di Via Pinerolo, 75 10060 Pancalieri (TO) Italia Tel. 011 975606 - Fax 011 975078 PRODUCT OF ITALY Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il Best before: A consommer de préférence avant le:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Prepare pour panna cotta or Panna cotta?

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna cotta has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna cotta has less sugar: 14.4 g versus 77 g per 100 g.

More comparisons