Prepare pour panna cotta vs Panna cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prepare pour panna cotta | Panna cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 167 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 77 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 56% fewer calories (167 kcal vs 377 kcal).
- Prepare pour panna cotta has no fat, while Panna cotta has 9.2 g.
- Prepare pour panna cotta has no saturated fat, while Panna cotta has 6.7 g.
- Panna cotta has 81% less sugar (15 g vs 77 g).
- Panna cotta has 98% more protein (4.4 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Panna cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Prepare pour panna cotta
Not available.
Panna cotta
lait entier,crème 43 %,sucre,gélatine,amidon modifié,émulsifiant,E471,E339,carraghenane,arôme naturel,sans gluten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prepare pour panna cotta or Panna cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta has less sugar: 15 g versus 77 g per 100 g.