Panna cotta vs Preparado per panna Cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta | Preparado per panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 236 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 29% fewer calories (167 kcal vs 236 kcal).
- Panna cotta has 43% less fat (9.2 g vs 16 g).
- Panna cotta has 33% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 10 g).
- Panna cotta has 17% less sugar (15 g vs 18 g).
- Panna cotta has 48% more protein (4.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only Panna cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Panna cotta
lait entier,crème 43 %,sucre,gélatine,amidon modifié,émulsifiant,E471,E339,carraghenane,arôme naturel,sans gluten
Preparado per panna Cotta
zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, gelificante: pectina; sale, estratto naturale di vaniglia. Ingredienti guarnizione ai frutti di bosco (37%): zucchero, frutti di bosco in proporzione variabile 35% (mirtilli neri, more, fragole, lamponi), sciroppo di glucosio - fruttosio, addensanti: amido modificato da mais, farina di semi di carrube; correttore di acidità: acido citrico; aromi naturali. Può contenere tracce di latte e suoi derivati, soia e suoi derivati.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta or Preparado per panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta has less sugar: 15 g versus 18 g per 100 g.