Comparison

Prepare pour panna cotta vs Preparado per panna Cotta

Overall, Preparado per panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPrepare pour panna cottaPreparado per panna Cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 377 kcal 236 kcal
Fat 0 g 16 g
Saturated fat 0 g 10 g
Sugars 77 g 18 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Protein 0.1 g 2.3 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Preparado per panna Cotta has 37% fewer calories (236 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Prepare pour panna cotta has no fat, while Preparado per panna Cotta has 16 g.
  • Prepare pour panna cotta has no saturated fat, while Preparado per panna Cotta has 10 g.
  • Preparado per panna Cotta has 77% less sugar (18 g vs 77 g).
  • Preparado per panna Cotta has 96% more protein (2.3 g vs 0.1 g).

Ingredients

Prepare pour panna cotta

Not available.

Preparado per panna Cotta

zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, gelificante: pectina; sale, estratto naturale di vaniglia. Ingredienti guarnizione ai frutti di bosco (37%): zucchero, frutti di bosco in proporzione variabile 35% (mirtilli neri, more, fragole, lamponi), sciroppo di glucosio - fruttosio, addensanti: amido modificato da mais, farina di semi di carrube; correttore di acidità: acido citrico; aromi naturali. Può contenere tracce di latte e suoi derivati, soia e suoi derivati.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Prepare pour panna cotta or Preparado per panna Cotta?

Overall, Preparado per panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Preparado per panna Cotta has fewer calories: 236 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Preparado per panna Cotta has less sugar: 18 g versus 77 g per 100 g.

More comparisons