Comparison

Panna Cota vs Preparato per panna cotta

Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPanna CotaPreparato per panna cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 175 kcal 256 kcal
Fat 12 g 18 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 12 g
Sugars 12 g 16 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Protein 3.8 g 2.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna Cota has 32% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 256 kcal).
  • Panna Cota has 33% less fat (12 g vs 18 g).
  • Panna Cota has 43% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Panna Cota has 25% less sugar (12 g vs 16 g).
  • Panna Cota has 34% more protein (3.8 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

Panna Cota

Not available.

Preparato per panna cotta

Zucchero, amido di mais, destrosio, carragenina, sale, aroma naturale di vaniglia.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Panna Cota or Preparato per panna cotta?

Overall, Panna Cota has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna Cota has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons