Comparison
Crème de Moules vs Paté de atún con aceitunas
Overall, Crème de Moules has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème de Moules | Paté de atún con aceitunas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 183 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crème de Moules has 29% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- Crème de Moules has 41% less fat (13 g vs 22 g).
- Crème de Moules has 31% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Paté de atún con aceitunas has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Paté de atún con aceitunas has 24% more protein (12 g vs 9.1 g).
Ingredients
Crème de Moules
Not available.
Paté de atún con aceitunas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de Moules or Paté de atún con aceitunas?
Overall, Crème de Moules has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crème de Moules has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paté de atún con aceitunas has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Crème de Moules vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Paté de atún con aceitun... vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Crème de Moules vs Berberechos al natural S
Paté de atún con aceitun... vs Berberechos al natural S
Crème de Moules vs Makreel in blik
Makreel in blik vs Paté de atún con aceitun...
Crème de Moules vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Paté de atún con aceitun...