Paté de atún con aceitunas vs Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Overall, Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de atún con aceitunas | Filetes de melva en aceite d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 257 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 8.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 24.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 31% fewer calories (178 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 62% less fat (8.3 g vs 22 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 61% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 51% more protein (24.7 g vs 12 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Paté de atún con aceitunas
Not available.
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Melva (66%), aceite de oliva (33%) y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de atún con aceitunas or Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.