Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Pacific Red Salmon | Filetes de melva en aceite d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 159 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 8.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 24.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 10% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 178 kcal).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 12% less fat (7.3 g vs 8.3 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no sugar, while Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no salt, while Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 1 g.
- Only Wild Pacific Red Salmon lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
0513226 0517129 New CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD MSC www.msc.org Nixe Hing High WILD PACIFIC RED SALMON TM
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Melva (66%), aceite de oliva (33%) y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Red Salmon or Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.