Makreel in blik vs Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Overall, Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makreel in blik | Filetes de melva en aceite d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 8.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 24.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 32% fewer calories (178 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 56% less fat (8.3 g vs 19 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 50% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Makreel in blik has no sugar, while Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 15% more protein (24.7 g vs 21 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Makreel in blik
Makreelfilets, koolzaadolie 31 %, water, zout.
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Melva (66%), aceite de oliva (33%) y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makreel in blik or Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makreel in blik has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.